|
1
|
- Lower Makefield Township, PA
- February 7, 2005
- George Alexandridis, PE – Chief Engineer, DRJTBC
- Bijan Pashanamaei, PE – Project Manager, DMJM+HARRIS
|
|
2
|
- Federal Highway Administration
- Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
- New Jersey Department of Transportation
|
|
3
|
- Environmental Documentation and Preliminary Engineering funded by DRJTBC
- $142 million planned for the project in the Capital Program
- Current project estimate is $195 million
- Construction of improvements to Scudder Falls Bridge, I-95 and the
interchanges within the project limits
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- To alleviate traffic congestion and improve operational and safety
conditions
- Goals:
- Meet current Design Criteria – AASHTO, PENNDOT, NJDOT for geometry,
lanes, shoulders, acceleration/deceleration lanes, structures, etc.
- Achieve LOS D Operation in Design Year (2030)
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Scoped as an Environmental Assessment (EA)
- Use PENNDOT Transportation Development Process
- Federal Highway Administration is the lead agency
- Goal:
Satisfy Purpose & Need while avoiding, minimizing and
mitigating impact to the extent practicable
|
|
9
|
- Quarterly Newsletter
- Project Hotline (800) 879-0849
- Project Web Site www.scudderfallsbridge.com
- Press Releases/work with media
- Letters and e-mails
- Informational signs on I-95
|
|
10
|
- Developed evaluation criteria
- Completed Traffic Projection Modeling (DVRPC)
- Completed Existing SFB Evaluation
- Further developed alternatives to:
- Meet project objectives
- Minimize impacts on the environment
- Consistent with community objectives
- Commission and consultant project team
- Conducted & Completed Traffic Analysis for Alternative Validation
|
|
11
|
- Project purpose and need
- Local communities
- Environmental resources
- Cultural resources
- Traffic and safety
- Security
- Ease of constructability
- Project cost
- Regional mobility
|
|
12
|
- On the Bridge 5 lanes northbound
4 lanes southbound
- I-95 in PA 3 lanes each direction
- I-95 in NJ 4 lanes
northbound 3 lanes
southbound
|
|
13
|
- Feasibility of rehabilitation vs. replacement
- Rehabilitation methods
- Impact of Alternatives
- Initial Cost for both rehabilitation & replacement options
- Life Cycle Cost (i.e. initial cost, maintenance, and upgrades)
- Consultant Team recommendation:
- Replace the existing bridge
- All alternatives shown tonight assume that the existing bridge will be
replaced
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Build No Improvement
- New, Wider Bridge
- Collector/Distributor Option
- Two Parallel Bridges
- Two Level Bridge
- Contraflow Lane(s)
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- Build No Improvement
- Improvements at Taylorsville Road Interchange
- Improvements at NJ Route 29 Interchange
|
|
21
|
- 4 - Build Alternatives
- Southbound Travel
- One off-ramp
- Two off-ramps
- Northbound Travel
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- 4 – Build Alternatives
- Folded Diamond with NJ 29 Southbound Alignment
- With a bypass for northbound Route 29
- Without a bypass for northbound Route 29
- Roundabout intersections (NJDOT)
- Folded Diamond with NJ 29 Northbound Alignment
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- Build No Improvement
- Widen to the Outside in NJ
- Widen to the Inside or Outside in PA
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- Complete Development of Alternatives
- Seek Early Input on Alternatives
- Ewing Township Meeting (January 10th)
- Lower Makefield Township Meeting (tonight)
- Evaluate Alternatives and Potential Impacts
- Meet with SACM and IAC
- Hold Open Houses in Spring 2005
|
|
33
|
|